Home | Business | KSF (IOM) depositors’ ‘Early Payment Scheme’ gets almost unanimous Tynwald approval
Newsletter
Email:
Poll: Reciprocal Health Agreement
What should be done about the loss of the Reciprocal Health Agreement

KSF (IOM) depositors’ ‘Early Payment Scheme’ gets almost unanimous Tynwald approval

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

The Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander (IOM) Ltd (KSF IOM) ‘Early Payment Scheme’ received an almost unanimous vote of approval in this week’s sitting of Tynwald (Tuesday 20th Jan). Liberal Vannin Party Leader, Peter Karran MHK was the only dissenting vote; which appears consistent with his views on the use of taxpayers’ money to bail out failed banks, or in this case, a bank that has nearly failed.

 

The ‘Scheme’ will provide a maximum payment of £1000 to ‘eligible’ depositors in KSF (IOM) on the 8th October, 2008. However, they must make an application for the payout and sign a ‘memorandum of assignment in favour of the (IOM) Treasury’; which will enable the government to recover the equivalent sum, by deduction, from any other payout the account holder receives.

 

The IOM Government has made available, from the Reserve Fund, £11million to meet any claims and the administration costs of the Scheme.

 

It is interesting to note that in the attached note to the Order, in the ‘Reasons for the Measure’ it states that they are: “To provide a level of financial support to those depositors facing cashflow difficulties following the freezing (our emphasis) of their assets at Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander (IOM) Ltd …”

 

Members of the Manx Government have been very scathing and critical of authorities in other jurisdictions ‘freezing assets’ yet appear unfazed by accepting the same has occurred in the IOM.

 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Scheme has not received universal acclaim from depositors in KSF (IOM) who had the assets ‘frozen’ by the authorities in the IOM, some of whom believe it is too little, and perhaps even too late for some.

 

Certainly there is a strong view held by a proportion of depositors that the Government is just trying to drag things out as long as possible to avoid having to trigger the Depositor’s Compensation Scheme.

 

The Manx Herald has received a copy of a letter from one disgruntled depositor, who views the DCS as a sham; and who, incidentally, expresses concern that the Financial Supervision Commission is spending its time trying to track down who leaked a copy of the parent company guarantee instead of working to solve the issues with the bank.

 

Furthermore, the KSF Depositors Action Group have posted, on their website, a press release, dated 17th January 2009, which states inter alia: “Despite goodwill, effort and confidentiality by those representing the KSFIOM Depositors Action Group, they have yet to see anything to convince them that the suggestion of an alternative to liquidation is little more than an attempt to prevent the Depositors Compensation Scheme (DCS) being triggered. The activation of the DCS would not only cost the IOM Government and local banks dearly but would expose the scheme for what it is; namely an inadequate and outdated guise of protection that contains so many provisos and matters open to legal interpretation that the Government is refusing to explain clearly how it would work if it were to be put into action.”

 

This may be a cynical viewpoint, but it perhaps has some justification given that it appears that the Government prefers an ‘orderly winding down’ of the bank to presumably what they think will be a ‘disorderly winding-up’.

 

Full details of the ‘Early Payment Scheme’ can be found on the government’s website www.gov.im

 Link: www.ksfiomdepositors.org

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (3 posted):

Not Albert Einstein on 16 February, 2009 11:25:02
avatar
What I find amazing is that there are thousands of victims in the KSFIOM saga – yet not one of them can be bothered to place a comment in the public domain in response to this informative article.

It appears that they are happy to spend their valuable time chatting away in various “closed forums” becoming comatose by impractical and sometimes ridiculous resolutions to do things which never happen.

Well done to the Herald for maintaining balanced, erudite reporting on this appalling catastrophe involving the innocent KSFIOM depositors.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Brian on 17 February, 2009 09:13:07
avatar
One of the reason for the lack of comment is that it appears that most of the time the Code catcha will not let us post (it does but a technical fault is preventing a message being shown that comments are being sent for approval. We hope to have it fixed soon. - Ed)
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Mike on 22 February, 2009 02:17:42
avatar
I believe the SOA is a disgrace and should be investigated. Why does only 71% of the depositors receive 100% of their money and the remaining 29% do not? Well they take the money from the higher depositors to pay the lower depositors, so IOMG can claim they have paid back more depositors. It's another IOMG PR scam. If the bank went into liquidation as noraml, all depositors would get an equal and fair share of the available funds. However, IOMG won't allow that in fear they have to trigger the DSC, which is yet another IOMG PR scam. The so called £150 million pounds the IOMG are putting in the pot, it is only a loan, which will be repaid back before all depositors actually get paid out in full. In the end IOMG pay little for this debacle that they were partially responsible for. If our funds had been ring fenced in the UK, we wouldn't be in this disgraceful position. The IOMG failed to look after the depositors interests before and they continue fail us now. The only losers here are poor depositors, like myself that trusted their money in an IOM bank, BIG Mistake!!!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
0