Sections
KSFIOM Scheme of Arrangement defunct before it starts
“This new information which we know has always formed the basis of the Treasury’s expectations shows that the cashflow and distribution proposals currently contained in the Scheme of Arrangement to be detrimental to depositors when compared with straight liquidation."
So says a press release issued by the Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander (IOM) Depositors Action Group (DAG).
They claim the Scheme of Arrangement (SoA) - sponsored by the Isle of Man Government (IOMG), to avoid placing one of the island’s banks into liquidation, thus triggering its much maligned Depositors Compensation Scheme (DCS) - appears to have hit a problem before it starts.
DAG go on to say the progress report from the Administrator of KSFUK – the unfortunate destination for over 50% of KSFIOM’s funds on the advice of the IOM Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) and the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA), with the backing of the directors of KSFIOM - reports that the current intention of the KSFUK Administrator is to pay a minimum of 50p in the £. This early estimate suggests that the Administrator is taking a conservative view and returns may well reach 60p which is the critical level for the current IOMG SoA proposals.
The IOMG and the Bank made it clear in court, on 9th April, that if the distribution, from KSFUK to creditors of the Bank, were less than 60p there were advantages to creditors through the Scheme. With suggestions that the distribution may well exceed 60p it appears that the fundamentals of the proposed SoA make even less sense to KSFIOM depositors. Adoption of the Scheme, according to DAG, therefore, appears unlikely and any recommendation to the contrary from the IOMG may be dangerous.
With no reaction to this latest announcement forthcoming from the IOMG to give depositors a clear view of the situation, plans are proceeding for the DAG to open a number of international phone lines this coming Sunday to ensure that depositors are better informed regarding the value of their vote and the options open to them (see territories and numbers below).
This initiative is self-sponsored by the DAG, as apparently the Isle of Man ‘authorities’ have refused to offer an independent source of information for depositors who, it is claimed, have already suffered six months of stress and confusion. This state of play, in the opinion of DAG, looks set to continue.
A spokesman on behalf of the DAG says, “We always knew that the Isle of Man Government would go to any lengths to avoid liquidating a bank on the island and calling on its much trumpeted Depositors Compensation Scheme. It has spent the last six months and over £500,000 of taxpayers’ money devising a Scheme of Arrangement that does not satisfy anything other than its own political ambitions. Even at this stage the IOMG are more concerned with protecting themselves than with preserving the fundamental rights of those who entrusted their money to the island.”
They go on to say: “This new information which we know has always formed the basis of the Treasury’s expectations shows that the cashflow and distribution proposals currently contained in the Scheme of Arrangement to be detrimental to depositors when compared with straight liquidation. We still believe our legal rights are being removed, ensuring that the culpable parties in this financial disaster are never brought o account.
The DAG firmly believes that the time has finally come for the Isle of Man Government to fall into line with every other territory that was exposed by the demise of Kaupthing Bank and provide a prompt 100% return to depositors. With the likely returns over time projected at between 80-90%, this face saving exercise will cost the island little and offer much in terms of saving the Isle of Man’s reputation.”
The latest position statement from the Resolution Committee in Iceland remains the same, in that responsibility for deposits made at subsidiaries of Kaupthing Bank remain with that subsidiary and the jurisdiction in which they operated. A moratorium on repayments to creditors of Kaupthing Bank also remains in place; so it appears highly unlikely any funds will be forthcoming from that direction for many months, if at all.
However, it has been suggested in certain sections of the Icelandic media that a proposition was put together by Morgan Stanley, on behalf of the Resolution Committee, to return ‘New’ Kaupthing Bank to private ownership via a Danish bank. Certain advantages, for creditors of the bank and the Icelandic authorities, were mooted in the proposal; but it also said it would probably take some time to achieve and may not be progressed.
It is, however, interesting to note that the Icelandic authorities are keen to avoid a liquidation of the bank and appear to express a preference for a SoA of their own; which they say will prevent a reduction in the value of assets.
Therefore, the best hope for an improved outlook for KSF (IOM) depositors is the progress that seems to being made by the administrators of KSF (UK).
If they can return a minimum 50% of the £550m + deposited by KSF (IOM), in a fairly short timescale, then the Manx Herald thinks it should be possible to offer KSF (IOM) depositors a much better deal than the one which is currently on the table.
For further information go to www.ksfiomdepositors.org
PHONE LINES WILL OPEN 26/04/2009 these are for depositors only
UK +442032863458 +441312082492 +441614089580
SWEDEN +46406664912
DENMARK +4536997139
AUSTRALIA +61280067975
NEW ZEALAND +6498899286
BRAZIL +552130204917
USA +13058314830
HONG KONG +85281764458
ROI (IRELAND) +353212348147
FRANCE +33977196365



del.icio.us
Digg
As for Iceland, depositors were told that KSFIOM was in a consortium of 5 safe Nordic banks & that deposits were 'secured' by a parental guarantee from the parent Kaupthing bank in Iceland. Then suddenly 'ACRABADABRA! - Iceland conveniently says that the security of deposits in KSFIOM rest solely with the Bank! I learn 2 lessons from this: (1) never believe that you can trust an off-shore bank with your money,(2) never think for a moment that a financial supervision commission that is there to protect your money will be on your side should your bank let you down.
Jim
It's criminally unjust and no one will do anything about it because the Government itself is behind this travesty of justice wrought upon ordinary decent savers whose only ‘crime’ was to choose the so-called safe haven of the Isle of Man to deposit their life-savings. What lies! What deceit! Two British Governments could not between them bring themselves together to bring a right, proper and just outcome to people depending upon their savings for their very survival. It’s disgusting! It’s abhorrent! It’s sickening! It’s happening right here, right now under the ‘watch’ of the Government of the ISLE OF MAN. Do not under any circumstances believe any publicity given in pursuit of securing funds in this island. It’s simply not worth the risk; take a few points less and save your hard earned money somewhere safe where they value customers enough to refund their deposits in full - 100% - not on this island where they don’t even have a bank of last resort and concoct schemes that claim to pay you compensation – but then claw the money back again before you've even got your capital back, let alone lost interest.
It is a clear sign of the way modern humanity is moving; liars such as Clinton and OJ Simpson started a trend in warping the English language that others have utilised in 'spin' techniques to tell 'inexactitudes' in the hope of catching the unwary. Takers win and givers lose when God is no longer 'watching you' and you really must take all you can before leaving this world for good because you're 'worth it' – so they tell you. Where the hell are we all going.
Ice
The depositors should not be having to fight for the injustice of the £550 Million theft to be overturned, that is a clear role for Tynwald!
Six months on and we are STILL no nearer a resolution!! How come cat charities seem to be able to convince the UK Chancellor that it is in his interest to have the money returned, yet Tynwald cant make a case for the KSF depositors?
As the blogger points out, many people were forced to use IOM banks as they could not get UK ones. The IoM also then passed on the UK FSA advice for KSF to put its money in a dodgy UK sister bank. The UK has an obligation here yet the IoM Government seem to prefer throwning Manx Taxpayers money at spin rather than political dialog.
I suppose it is not that suprising if Tynwald was also conned into forking out £500,000 for the defunct Vista Windows which even Microsoft admit is rubbish.
And it will be continued. The IoMG seems totally lost with its apparently normally approach of "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" approach typified by Allan Bell's style. The IoMG is just about to suffer a major embarrassment when its ridiculously crude attempt to protect the insider incompetents whose inaction led to this disaster for basically innocent depositors is rejected.
The truth will out, it always does. The politicians simply hope it comes out slowly and when the guilty have been able to quietly retire with their spoils.
The current situation looks a little more problematic. I would suggest that the House of Keys members, and the ministers here, spend some time reflecting on the the appropriateness of their joint approach of burying their heads in the sand, and hoping that their judiciary might be able to bury legitimate complaints, and rise to the situation with some significant proactive measures.
It is truly unfortunate that those the House of Keys had appointed failed them, but that is the reality, time for them to move out from the false protection of denial and assume their responsibilities.
Post your comment