Home | News | Watterson Budget reform proposals get positive response
Newsletter
Email:
Poll: Reciprocal Health Agreement
What should be done about the loss of the Reciprocal Health Agreement

Watterson Budget reform proposals get positive response

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

At the end of last year, Rushen MHK Juan Watterson published a consultation document proposing reforms to the budget system to allow people to comment on the proposals before they are voted on in Tynwald. 

Mr Watterson reports the overwhelming feedback was that six days was insufficient for Members of Tynwald to scrutinise the budget before voting on it. It was also felt public input on the budget proposals was a positive step.

Mr Watterson says in a press release he has issued: “I would like to thank all of the people who gave me formal and informal feedback on the Budget proposals. I was gratified to see that people agreed with the suggestions I put forward which will be reflected in the final Bill. I was also grateful to those who suggested additional issues to address as well as concerns that they sought more clarity over. I was, however, very disappointed that the Treasury Minister did not take the time during the three month consultation period to comment on the proposed reforms.”

Mr Watterson added: “I will be meeting with legislative drafters from the Attorney General’s chambers in the next few weeks in preparing the draft bill which I am happy to consult with interested parties on. I hope that this will be the next positive step in making more accountable to the people it serves, and give them some say in how all of our money is spent.”

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted):

Premier Shareholders Group on 08 January, 2010 08:34:59
avatar
The Premier Shareholders Group is equally disappointed that the Treasury Minister, Mr. A Bell, could not be bothered... er did not take the time in the last seven yeas to address the matter of how the directors of the Premier Low Risk Fund plc obtained the life savings of hundreds of pensioners by advising them that the Fund offered "Capital Security and Guarantees" similar to a Building Society.

Then the pensioners lost up to 50% of their money to rescue it from the clutches of the Fund

Fortunately for Mr Juan Watterson he has the luxury of holding meetings in the Attorney General’s chambers to happily consult with interested parties about his "reforms" – a resource denied to the pensioners whose lives have been reduced to misery and despair by a fallacious Isle of Man based company and a government that exhibits little interest in upholding basic human rights.

But then that’s how things are done on the Isle of Man and the reason why people should never invest or deposit a single penny on the Island.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
0