Home | Politics | Former Braddan clerk ‘tried, tested and proven to deliver’ – not a lot of votes
Newsletter
Email:
Poll: Reciprocal Health Agreement
What should be done about the loss of the Reciprocal Health Agreement

Former Braddan clerk ‘tried, tested and proven to deliver’ – not a lot of votes

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

In yesterday’s (Thursday 24th April) local authority election the five members of the current Board of Braddan Parish Commissioners comprehensively saw off the challenge of sacked former clerk Charles Lewin.

 

Mr Lewin who had predicted, to one of the other candidates, that he would capture the third highest vote, ended up bottom of the poll, nearly 200 votes behind the fifth placed, and successful candidate, Mrs Hodge.

 

Perhaps predictably, Mr Lewin was ungracious in defeat and, before slinking away at the end of night, reverted to type by hurling insults at another successful candidate, Andrew Jessopp; who Mr Lewin had frequently clashed with prior to his dismissal for serious misconduct.

 

Mr Lewin also continued, when interviewed by Manx Radio’s Dan Davies, post defeat, to try to convince (himself no doubt) that sound financial control, of the authority, had evaporated with his dismissal. Unfortunately, for Mr Lewin, the voters have obviously formed the opposite conclusion; and have chosen to believe the Commissioners.

 

A delighted Commissioners’ Chairman, Mrs Hodge, speaking to Manx Radio after the results were announced, said that she hoped the Authority could now move forward in a more positive direction; and, as she believed that she had a good team to work with, this was entirely possible.

 However, Mrs Hodge added that she had been concerned by Mr Lewin issuing two manifestos; one for the general populace and another specifically for the tenants in the Commissioners’ houses. She claimed that the manifestos contained a number of misstatements and that the Commissioners would be responding in due course.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (9 posted):

Mrs S Miller on 27 April, 2008 07:12:10
avatar
It still beggers me that Mr Lewin has not been charged with anything. Exactly what did he do? If it was a financial thing, then where are the charges? Are the Commissioners not the bosses, did they not make the financial decisions? Seems to me that Braddan Commissioners need to look at themselves, they obviously need to go on a balance sheet reading course. I am afraid I firmly believe the buck stops at them. They are elected to protect our interests, and they havent. You can\'t blame other people for your mistakes Braddan Commissioners!!!! Mr Lewin is innocent until proven guilty if you ask me!! When it comes to lying, then the Braddan Commissioners need to look at their own words. Did not the Chairman issue a Report saying everyone was working together, team Braddan and all that. Next thing we hear is there are/have been deep internal divisions. Make your minds up!! Not one person was to blame for the mess Braddan Commissioners finds themselves in today, 5 were!!!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
anne hamilton on 02 May, 2008 05:06:13
avatar
Mr Lewin seemed to be the only person working at the Braddan offices. I have never known such a hard worker, maybe that's misconduct!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Anne Hamilton on 02 May, 2008 05:06:13
avatar
Mr Lewin seemed to be the only person who worked in that office. I have never know such a conscientious worker, perhaps that was his misdemeanour!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Chris on 03 May, 2008 04:43:55
avatar
Why dont you arrange for Braddan Parish Commissioners to place their Estimates for the current finaancial year and the accounts for the year ending 31st March 2007 and 2008 on their website, if you want to practice what you preach, openness and transparency, then we can all see if the Commmissioners have estimated for a deficency for the current year as alledged by Mr Lewin and being denied by BPC.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Chris on 03 May, 2008 04:43:55
avatar
What action is Braddan Commissioners taking to recover or seek damages from Mr Lewin, if of course he is guilty of anyhing?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Concerned on 04 May, 2008 06:55:20
avatar
What are the alledged mistatements made by Mr Lewin?
Did not the Braddan Five also issue two manifestos as i got two, the one that came in the five pack and then one the night before the election?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Concerned on 04 May, 2008 06:55:20
avatar
Could we all be advised why the Commissioners appointed an advocate to be the returning officer when Mr Lewin used to perform this function and was very efficent? What did this appoinment cost the ratepayers? Were any of the five manifestos of the existing Commissioners prepared or copied in the Commissioners Office?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
bradratepayer on 05 May, 2008 03:33:31
avatar
Definately two of those manifestos from the Braddan 5 must have been done in the office, using our money from rates, should have been paid for by them not us! Do our rates not pay for the office building, yet on election day we were only allowed to go in the back door!! Wouldn't have been like that in Mr Lewin's day, we could walk in the front door of our own building! I would also like to know why there was an Advocate appointed for the job of returning officer. Could the new Clerk not cope! tut tut. Bring back Buster Lewin. He cared about the people and got the job done!!!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
on 18 June, 2009 03:48:18
avatar
Buster is found to be unfairly dismissed by Braddan Commissioners, now he has been totally cleared of any form of wrong doing by a Tynwald Select Committee then all 5 Commissioners who were responible for sacking him which includes the Editor of this Website Andrew Jessopp should resign now and let the people choose now they are aware of all the facts.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Rate this article
3.90